A winery company filed an interim measure application against the violation of its European trademarks, but the court ruled it inadmissible. The company then appealed to the Court of Venice, arguing that the opposing party's trademarks posed a risk of confusion or similarity with their own. The case also involved suspending judicial proceedings pending the resolution of the nullity action for the proposed brand to the EUIPO, which is addressed in Article 128, paragraphs 4 and 132 of the EU Trademark Regulations.
